Victorian Manchester, Living & Working Conditions

19th Century Life in Victorian Manchester


Working, Health, Housing & the People of Manchester

Despite the growing wealth due to trade and commerce,
prosperity lay in the hands of very few of Manchester’s residents. The
working people, who actually produced the wealth, lived, worked and
died in conditions of the most desperate poverty and degradation. Innumerable
reports and surveys were carried out during the 19th century, and they
all told much the same story: poor wages, impossibly long working hours,
dangerous and unsanitary working conditions, even more unsanitary dwellings,
little or no health provisions, high infant mortality and a short life
expectancy.
A map of Manchester showing age of death figures in the mid-nineteenth
century revealed that life expectancy was directly related to wealth.
Put simply, the poor died younger and the rich lived longer. At that
time, Ancoats was the death black spot of Manchester.

River Irwell near Manchester cathedral in the early 19th centuryCastlefield Canal Basin with Railway ViaductsPlatt's Mill, OldhamCellar Dwelling in Salford
Left to Right: The River Irwell near the Cathedral
in the early 19th Century ; Castlefield – urban Victorian industrial
landscape; Platt’s Mill in Oldham around the end of the 19th Century; Salford Cellar Dwelling from “The Builder” 1862.

Records show that by 1830 there were over 560 cotton
mills in Lancashire, employing more than 110,000 workers, of which 35,000
were children – some as young as six years of age. Wages for children
were about 2s.3d. (two shillings and three pence) per week (about 11½
new pence), but adults were paid about 10 times more. Hence, it made
economic sense to employ as many children and as few adults as possible,
and this is exactly what happened. Youngest children were employed to
crawl beneath machinery (while still in operation) to gather up loose
cotton – they were known as “scavengers” and many died by
getting caught up in machinery.
Those that survived to adulthood had permanent stoops or were crippled
from the prolonged crouching that the job entailed. The typical working
day was 14 hours long, but many were much longer, as, without regulation,
unscrupulous mill owners could demand any terms they liked.

Victorian Attitudes

Any attention that the plight of working people drew
from a wider middle class public was generally disparaging and attitudes
tended to be laisser faire . The poor were regarded as an underclass,
whose degradation was largely their own fault; frequently it was stated
that God wished them to be poor; they were a semi-class of probable
criminal tendencies.
Victorians distinguished between the “deserving” and the “undeserving”
poor. Widows, orphans, old people and those whose sickness rendered
them incapable of work were regarded as deserving and could receive
help through the system of Poor Houses, degrading though these were.
The other poor or unemployed were regarded as undeserving and, without
any social support system in place, were left entirely to their own
devices.
Acquired wealth, on the other hand, was commonly seen as a visible sign
of virtue: the poor were bad, the rich were good – it was a natural
order. Another popular concept was that if one worked hard, this would
be rewarded by an increase in wealth.

Population Growth in Manchester

Manchester saw exponential population growth during
the early 19th century – while London’s population doubled, Manchester’s
quadrupled! Here are figures for population growth in Manchester, based
on local period censuses:

1717: c10,000
1758: c17,000
1773: 22,481
1801: 75,281
1811: 89,068
1821: 126,066
1831: 182,016
1841: 235,507
1851: 303,382
1871: 351,189

Workers’ Housing in Manchester

By and large the workers lived near and around their
workplace, and the wealthy lived a few miles outside the city in their
garden suburbs. Houses were “jerry” built, without control or regulation
of any kind. Builders, usually the employer, would build so as to cram
as many houses as possible into the space available.
There was no water or services, and no attempt to provide privacy of
any kind. People worked in shifts and shared beds. Ten or twelve people
could share the one bedroom, and up to 100 houses shared the one “privvy”
– usually a deep hole dug in the corner of a yard, or a “midden” – a
heap against a wall.
Houses were damp – there were no damp-proof courses, and no double brick
walls. Rain leeched through walls, and even in dry summers, damp rose
up the walls. The only relief from damp was the building of cellars
to contain it. However, these cellars inevitably became dwellings for
subtenants.
Manchester and Salford’s cellar dwellings were the root of most health
problems, and became a national disgrace. “The Builder” magazine
of 1864 illustrated the worst dwellings, and many celebrated figures
emerged to urge for improvement of the lot of working people.
John Kay published “The Moral and Physical Conditions of the
working Classes” in 1832, Engels
wrote his well-known “The Condition of the Working Class in
England” in 1844 based on the plight of the Manchester underclass,
and in 1842 Edwin Chadwick published his “Report on the Sanitary
Conditions of the Labouring Population” . ‘Official’ paupership
figures for the “Township of Manchester” were the highest in Britain
– higher even than in London’s east end.

Labour & Wages

Average wages in 19th century Manchester were well
below subsistence level. A report by Fred Scott for the Manchester Statistical
Society in 1889 found that over 40% of working men interviewed in Salford
were “irregularly employed”, and that 61% could be defined as “very
poor” with a weekly income of less than 4 shillings (20p) per week.
The main problem was casual labour. Payments from the Manchester & Salford
District Provident Society’s Poverty Fund in the winter of 1878-79 revealed
that the vast majority of qualifying applicants were casual and seasonal
workers – among them were warehousemen, builder’s labourers, general
labourers, storemen and transport men – most of these were of Irish
descent. In the days before any welfare provision, there was no sick
pay – if you couldn’t work, you weren’t paid.
Many people worked up to 14 hours a day for 7 days a week; a few “benevolent”
employers allowed a 6 day week with compulsory church attendance on
the seventh.

Manchester’s Immigrant Population

Immigrants also formed a large proportion of the
poor. By 1851, Irish immigrants comprised around 15% of the city’s poor.
Half of the people registered in the New Bridge Street Workhouse in
the 180s and 1890s were Irish Catholics. Most lived in Ancoats, (40%
Irish according to the 1900 census), probably the poorest and most deprived
area of the city. A small area of Chorlton on Medlock was also known
as “Little Italy” on account of the large numbers of immigrant
Italians who lived there in a sort of ghetto situation. They formed
the largest section of the vast casual labour force, which put to hard
long hours when trade was good, were first to be laid off in leaner
times. They formed the largest part of the Smithfield Market labour
force, comprised the majority of the city’s street sellers and hawkers,
dominated the building trade and figured largely in domestic service
(females in particular).

Disease & Health Issues in Victorian
Manchester

Manchester had become a very unhealthy place to live
in. Coal burning domestic fires and innumerable factory chimneys meant
that the city was overhung with a permanent pall of smoke, drenched
with acid rain, and suffered plagues of respiratory diseases (bronchitis,
influenza, pneumonia, asthma, as well as other industrial dust-related
diseases).
Life expectancy of a working man in Salford in the 1870s could be as
little as 17 years. While the opening of some hospitals after 1850 and
the application of public health measures saw a fast decline in infectious
diseases such as small pox, scarlet fever and other communicable diseases,
there were still many endemic diseases which plagued working people.
In sewage disposal, the city had little or no policy until the late
19th century. Ashpits and communal cesspits were common, and they overflowed
in rainy periods, and had to be emptied and carted away. This was, however,
rarely done. There were frequent official accounts of “midden” overflowing
into the cellars in which a large number of workers lived, with no attempt
made to relieve the problem.
Even by 1907 only about one-third of the city’s privvies were water
closets. Such water closets as there were before the 1870s simply ran
directly into the Irwell, from which most people obtained their drinking
water. Cholera was a common summer visitor to the city. The Manchester
and Salford Sanitary Association was formed in 1852 to promote public
health and sanitary reform. They had a vigorous programme which included
distributing thousands of tracts (though few poor people could read),
and delivering hundreds of public lectures. They also created isolation
hospitals for the worst diseases. Despite all this the city’s health
failed to improve.
But it was the airborne diseases which accounted for the greatest mortality
figures. Pulmonary Tuberculosis killed most people in Manchester.
The highest death risk areas of the city were all inner city zones,
occupied by the working poor : Ancoats, Chorlton-on-Medlock, Hulme and
Ardwick. It was not until the 1850s that relatively clean drinking water
came into the city from the completion of Longendale reservoir, (though
ordinary people had to queue at street standpipes to obtain it), and
that Thirlmere in the Lake District was added to the system in the 1890s.
These measures had a significant impact in improving the health of the
city’s residents. Cholera and typhoid were virtually wiped out at a
stroke.
Things were no better in the working mills of Lancashire. “Mill
Fever”, aching head, limbs and nausea was common. Workers usually
developed tuberculosis, bronchitis and asthma due to cotton lint and
dust which hung in the air – there were, of course, no health or safety
precautions or safeguards in place.

Infant Mortality in Victorian Times

The main killer of children was diarrhoea. Despite
greatly improved water supplies, the main threat still came from backyard
middens, insect borne germs, inadequate washing facilities, poor food
hygiene, and from a very poor diet. Manchester’s slow rate of conversion
to water closets and sewage disposal were at the root of its extraordinarily
high infant death figures. Many middens and privvies were still in use
well into the early 1900s.

Health Reforms

Not until later in the century did significant health
reforms improve the lot and the longevity of working people. New sewers
and sewage treatment plants and the appointment of Manchester’s first
Medical Officer of Health in 1868, who closed down virtually all of
the city’s cellar dwellings, made great improvements to the health and
well-being of ordinary people. The creation of public bath houses and
fine “water palaces” like Victoria
Baths
in Hathersage Road saw Manchester thrust into the forefront
of a burgeoning public health drive. Regulations governing the standards
of new houses were introduced after 1875, which controlled such things
as the size and number of required windows and permitted light levels,
enforced the introduction of back yards (albeit very small ones) and
back alleyways. Waterways and public taps, as well as public laundries
and wash houses were also introduced.
The foundation of Manchester’s Unhealthy Dwellings Committee meant that
around 500 houses a year were refurbished up to the new standards between
1885 and 1905, and over 2000 houses a year after that. By the turn of
the century, much of the worst insanitation of Manchester had been removed,
and the city’s health had improved so that it was no longer the black
spot of England.

Sources: See
Bibliography – Books about Manchester

See Also:

 


Google Search

Custom Search

 

Animated Papillon Graphics Butterfly Logo
Papillon Graphics

 

Copyright
© John Moss, Papillon Graphics AD 2013 Manchester, United Kingdom – all rights reserved.
This page last updated 15 Nov 11.